High-order harmonic generation of CO2 with different vibrational modes in an intense laser field
Du Hui, Zhang Hong-Dan, Zhang Jun, Liu Hai-Feng, Pan Xue-Fei, Guo Jing, Liu Xue-Shen†,
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: liuxs@jlu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61575077, 11271158, and 11574117).

Abstract
Abstract

We apply the strong-field Lewenstein model to demonstrate the high-order harmonic generation of CO2 with three vibrational modes (balance vibration, bending vibration, and stretching vibration) driven by an intense laser field. The results show that the intensity of harmonic spectra is sensitive to molecular vibrational modes, and the high harmonic efficiency with stretching vibrational mode is the strongest. The underlying physical mechanism of the harmonic emission can be well explained by the corresponding ionization yield and the time–frequency analysis. Finally, we demonstrate the attosecond pulse generation with different vibrational modes and an isolated attosecond pulse with a duration of about 112 as is generated.

1. Introduction

High-order harmonic generation (HHG) has been long investigated for its potential applications in modern physics.[16] The basic understanding of the high harmonic emission can be provided by the three-step model.[79] Electrons are ionized by tunneling to the continuum state; then the freed electrons move with oscillation of the electronic field and after the electric field changes the direction, the electrons may be captured by the parent ion again, radiating high energy harmonic photons. The harmonic spectrum is sensitive to the structure of molecules and induced dynamics, which makes HHG a promising tool to access ultrafast molecular imaging, observation of electron dynamics and molecular structures.[1012]

With the development of ultrafast laser pulse technology, HHG from molecules has been investigated both theoretically and experimentally.[1316] Studies on two-center system such as and H2 showed that the nuclear motion can weaken the efficiency of molecular HHG.[17,18] Spectral minimum induced by two-center interference in HHG from diatomic molecules such as N2, O2, CO also contains the information of molecular orbital and structures.[19,20] For the three-center system, a rich set of physical phenomena has attracted a lot of attention. The orbital density imaging of H2O has been realized by the calculation of the orientation-dependent ionization yield.[21] The HHG of the equilateral was investigated in numerical solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE), and the results indicated that the harmonic emission largely depends on the laser–molecule orientation and internuclear distance.[22] Qin et al.[23] demonstrated that the interference of the HHG spectra from CO2 at different alignment angles can modulate the spectra efficiently. It has also been shown that the HHG from CO2 is very sensitive to multiple molecular orbitals that the effect of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and HOMO-2 is important at small alignment angles and only HOMO becomes dominant at large alignment angles.[24,25] Chen et al.[26] revealed that the ionization process can remarkably influence the intersections of the HHG spectra from O2 and CO2 molecules at different orientation angles. Moreover, the ultrafast molecular imaging of CO2 has become possible by electron diffraction[27] or extracting the photoelectron momentum spectra of CO2 probed with circularly polarized laser pulse.[28] Some other polyatomic molecules have also begun to generate further interest. The harmonic yield on different angles between the molecular axis and the laser polarization has proved to contain the fingerprint of the highest occupied molecular orbitals in acetylene and allene, which agrees with the numerical results.[29] Le et al.[30] proposed an efficient method of the quantitative rescattering theory (QRS) for calculation of HHG from CCl4 molecule, which well reproduces the minimum in HHG spectra observed in available experiments. It has also been reported that the HHG intensity can be enhanced with armchair grapheme since the initial electron density distribution along the x axis is much larger than that along the y axis.[31] Very recently, harmonic emission in benzene with linearly and circularly polarized laser pulses has illustrated that the ionic motion has a large effect on the harmonic response.[32]

Here we demonstrate the HHG of CO2 with different vibrational modes (balance vibration, bending vibration, stretching vibration) driven by an intense laser field. The results show that the high harmonic efficiency of CO2 with stretching vibrational mode is the strongest. The underlying physical mechanism of the HHG can be well explained by the corresponding ionization yield and the time–frequency analysis. When the CO2 molecule with stretching vibrational mode is exposed in the intense laser field with τd = 3 fs, a strong and single attosecond (asec) pulse can be generated.

2. Method

The calculations performed in this paper are based on the strong-field Lewenstein model, which has been widely used to investigate the process of harmonic emission.[7,33,34] The transition amplitude has the form of

where E(t) is the driving field and A(t) is its associated vector potential. ɛ is the positive regularization constant, τ is the interval of the ionized electron between ionization and recombination. S(pst,t,τ) represents that the quasi-classical action at the stationary points can be calculated by

where pst(t,τ) is the stationary momentum, which can be written as

The harmonic spectrum intensity is proportional to the Fourier transformation of the time-dependent dipole acceleration

By superposing several orders of the harmonic spectrum (here q is the harmonic order) we can obtain an attosecond pulse as follows:

3. Numerical results

The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of CO2 molecule is constructed by the GAMESS-UK package,[35] which is used as the initial input. In the gas phase, the CO2 molecule has three internal vibrations: the balance vibrational mode (the atoms symmetrically stretch along the molecular axis), bending vibrational mode, and stretching vibrational mode (the atoms asymmetrically stretch along the molecular axis). The three different vibrational modes are taken into account and the corresponding electron density of coordinate–space orbital |φ(r)|2 is shown in Fig. 1. The density distribution is very sensitive to the molecular vibrational modes and shows different characteristics depending on different vibrational modes. We can see from Figs. 1(a)1(c), the electron density distribution of the balance vibrational mode has a “mirror symmetry” structure, which is broken in bending and stretching vibrational modes and gradually converges.

Fig. 1. The electron density of coordinate–space orbital |φ(r)|2 of the HOMO of CO2 molecule with (a) balance vibrational mode, (b) bending vibrational mode and (c) stretching vibrational mode.

We apply the strong-field Lewenstein model to demonstrate the HHG of CO2 in a linearly polarized laser field, which has the form as E(t) = E0f(t)cos(ωt), where is the Gaussian envelope; the peak intensity of the laser pulse is chosen as 6 × 1014 W/cm2. The frequency ω = 0.0569 a.u. (800 nm in wavelength) and τd is the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the laser field. τd = 3 fs and τd = 5 fs are considered respectively. The lasers’ polarization directions are assumed to be parallel to the molecular axis in our calculations and the corresponding electric fields are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. The electric fields of the 800 nm laser pulse (red solid line) and corresponding pulse envelope (black dashed line) with (a) τd = 3 fs, (b) τd = 5 fs.

Figure 3 shows the HHG of the CO2 molecule with different molecular vibrational modes for τd = 3 fs and τd = 5 fs. For τd = 3 fs, figure 3(a) shows that the harmonic intensity of the CO2 with the stretching vibrational mode is at least 3 orders of magnitude higher than that with the balance vibrational mode, and the intensity of the spectrum with the bending vibrational mode is a little stronger than that with the balance vibrational mode. These results indicate that the HHG spectrum is sensitive to molecular vibrational modes.

Fig. 3. The HHG of CO2 with different vibrational modes in the intense laser field with the peak intensity of 6 × 1014 W/cm2. (a) τd = 3 fs, (b) τd = 5 fs.

For τd = 5 fs, figure 3(b) shows that the spectrums with three vibrational modes exhibit the similar tendency except more modulations compared with that for τd = 3 fs.

Figure 4 shows the ionization yield of CO2 molecule with different vibrational modes for the cases of τd = 3 fs and τd = 5 fs. It is clear to see that the ionization yield of CO2 with the balance vibrational mode is the lowest, the ionization yield of CO2 with the bending vibrational mode is a little enhanced and the ionization yield of CO2 with the stretching vibrational mode is the largest, which results in the enhancement of HHG intensity with the stretching vibrational mode. We can find from Fig. 1 that the electron density distribution of the balance vibrational mode distributes around the two carbon nuclei and the electron density distribution of the stretching vibrational mode almost distributes around the carbon nucleus in the positive z direction. Electrons are attracted by two carbon nuclei in the balance vibrational mode, but in the stretching vibrational mode electrons feel the attractive forces mostly from one carbon nucleus, which may lead to the electrons being easy to ionize in the stretching vibrational mode.

Fig. 4. Ionization yields of CO2 molecule with different vibrational modes. (a) τd = 3 fs, (b) τd = 5 fs.

We investigate the time frequency distributions of harmonics from the 60th to 90th of CO2 with different vibrational modes for the cases of τd = 3 fs, which are shown in Figs. 5(a)5(c). It is clear to see that the intensity of the emission peaks with the stretching vibrational mode are the strongest, which is in accordance with the high harmonic generation and the corresponding ionization yields shown in Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 4(a).

Fig. 5. (a)–(c) Time frequency distributions of harmonics from 60th to 90th and (d)–(f) the temporal profiles of generated attosecond pulses from CO2 with different vibrational modes for the case of τd = 3 fs.

Figures 5(d)5(f) show the temporal profiles of the generated attosecond pulses from CO2 by performing the inverse Fourier transforms of the spectrum with different vibrational modes. Figure 5(d) shows that, by properly filtering the harmonic spectrum from 54th to 82th with the balance vibrational mode, an isolated attosecond pulse with a duration of about 120 as is generated. An asec pulse train with two radiation pulses is generated with bending vibrational mode as depicted in figure 5(e) by superposing harmonics from the 61th to 83th order. Figure 5(f) shows that a strong and isolated asec pulse with a duration of about 112 as is obtained with the stretching vibrational mode by superposing the harmonics from the 57th to 83th order. Furthermore, the peak intensity of the asec pulse is gradually enhanced from Fig. 5(d) to Fig. 5(e), and the intensity of asec pulse with the stretching vibrational mode is about 3 orders of magnitude higher than that with the balance vibrational mode.

4. Conclusions

We demonstrate the generation of high-order harmonic and attosecond pulse of CO2 with different vibrational modes by the strong-field Lewenstein model. The results show that the high-order harmonic yield is sensitive to the molecular vibrational mode, and the efficiency of harmonic spectrum from CO2 with the stretching vibrational mode is the strongest. The underlying physical mechanism of the HHG can be well explained by the corresponding ionization yields and the time-frequency analysis. When the CO2 molecule with the stretching vibrational mode is exposed in the intense laser field with τd = 3 fs, a strong isolated attosecond pulse with a duration of about 112 as is generated.

Reference
1LiP CLaughlinCChuS I 2014 Phys. Rev. 89 023431
2DuH CWenY ZWangX SHuB T 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 33202
3ZhangBYuanJZhaoZ 2014 Phys. Rev. 90 035402
4ZhongH YGuoJZhangH DDuHLiuX S 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 73202
5LuR FHeH XGuoY HHanK L 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 225601
6ZhangJGeX LWangTXuT TGuoJLiuX S 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 013418
7LewensteinMBalcouPIvanovM YL’HuillierACorkumP B 1994 Phys. Rev. 49 2117
8CorkumP B1993Phys. Rev. Lett.711993
9SchaferK JYangBDiMauroL FKulanderK C 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1599
10MaurerJDimitrovskiDChristensenLMadsenL BStapelfeldtH 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 123001
11GoulielmakisELohZ HWirthAet al. 2010 Nature 466 739
12ZhangC PMiaoX Y 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 043302
13PanYZhaoS FZhouX X 2013 Phys. Rev. 87 035805
14CabasseAHazeraCQuintardLCormierEPetitSConstantE 2016 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49 85601
15HeLLanPZhangQZhaiCWangFShiWLuP 2015 Phys. Rev. 92 043403
16ŚpiewanowskiM DMadsenL B 2014 Phys. Rev. 89 043407
17GeX LWangTGuoJLiuX S 2014 Phys. Rev. 89 023424
18BandraukA DChelkowskiSLuH 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 75602
19ZhuXZhangQHongWLanPLuP 2011 Opt. Express 19 437
20LaiXFariaC FdeM 2013 Phys. Rev. 88 013406
21PetrettiSSaenzACastroADeclevaP 2013 Chem. Phys. 414 45
22TchitchekovaD SLuHChelkowskiSBandraukA D 2011 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44 65601
23QinMZhuXLiYZhangQLanPLuP 2014 Phys. Rev. 89 013410
24JinCLeA TLinC D 2011 Phys. Rev. 83 053409
25SmirnovaOMairesseYPatchkovskiiSDudovichNVilleneuveDCorkumPIvanovM Y 2009 Nature 460 972
26ChenY JHuB 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 244109
27PetersMNguyen-DangT TCornaggiaCSaugoutSCharronEKellerAAtabekO 2011 Phys. Rev. 83 051403(R)
28ZhuXZhangQHongWLuPXuZ 2011 Opt. Express 19 13723
29TorresRKajumbaNUnderwoodJ GRobinsonJ SBakerSTischJ W Gde NaldaRBryanW AVelottaRAltucciCTurcuI C EMarangosJ P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 203007
30LeA TLuccheseR RLinC D 2013 Phys. Rev. 87 063406
31GuoJZhongHYanBChenYJiangYWangTShaoJZhengCLiuX S 2016 Phys. Rev. 93 033806
32WardlowADundasD 2016 Phys. Rev. 93 023428
33ChangZ 2005 Phys. Rev. 71 023813
34EtchesAMadsenL B 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 155602
35GuestM FBushI JVan DamH J JSherwoodPThomasJ M HVan LentheJ HHavenithR W AKendrickJ 2005 Mol. Phys. 103 719